| 
        
           
              |  | NOTE: The strategies for proofs of the theorems stated on this page are presented in " descriptive paragraphs". In some cases,  "formal" proofs may require expanding on these     details.
 
                     
                       | 
                         
                           |  | Two lines in the same plane are perpendicular if and only if they form a right angle. |  |  
                     
                       | Perpendicular lines (or segments) actually form four right angles, even if only one of the right angles is marked with a box.  The statement above is actually a theorem which is discussed further down on this page. |  |  
                       | You may also see this definition stated as: "If two lines intersect and form adjacent angles of equal measure,  the lines are perpendicular."
 |  
  
 
 There are a couple of  provable concepts relating to perpendicular lines that are intuitively just common sense: 
                     
                       | 
                         1.  The shortest distance from a point to a line is the perpendicular distance.
                         
                         Proof: Draw perpendicular from P to C with m∠C = 90º. Draw ΔPCA with A on m.    m∠P+m∠C+m∠A=180.
                           m∠P+m∠A=90, making ∠A an acute angle and
 m∠A < m∠C
                           . PC < PA (In a Δ, shorter side opp. smaller angle.). Since A can be located anywhere on line m, PC will be the shortest length.
 Intuitively: Any distance, other than the perpendicular distance, will be the hypotenuse of the right triangle, making it longer than PC.
 | 
                         
 .
 |  
                       | 2.  In a plane, through a point not on a line, there is one, and only one, perpendicular to the line. Indirect Proof: If we assume there are two perpendiculars to line m from point P, we will create a triangle containing two right angles. The measure of ∠P will be 0º (since the sum of the angle measures in a Δ = 180º) forcing  both perpendiculars to coincide (be the same).  Our assumption of 2 perpendiculars from  P is not possible.
 |  |  
                     
 Perpendicular lines can also be connected to the  concept of parallel lines:
 
                     
                       | 
                         3.  In a plane, if two lines are perpendicular to the same line, the two lines are parallel. If   t ⊥ m and s ⊥ m, then  t | | s.
 Indirect Proof:• There are only two possibilities: t | | s or t is not | | to s.
 In a plane, two straight lines are parallel or they intersect.
 
 • Assume t is not || s. Since the lines are not parallel, they must intersect at one point, call it P. Two straight lines can intersect in only one point. This is an assumption leading to a contradiction.
 
 • Since it is given that t ⊥
                           m and s ⊥ m, we now have two lines through P that are perpendicular to m. BUT, in a plane, through a point not on a line, there is one, and only one, perpendicular to the line.
 
 • The assumption leads to a contradiction.
 • Therefore:  t | | s
 
 |  Indirect Proof   |  
                       | 
                         4.  In a plane, if a line is perpendicular to one of two parallel lines, it is also perpendicular to the other line. 
 If m | | n and t ⊥ m, then t ⊥ n.
 
 Indirect Proof:
 • Assume t is not ⊥ n. This is an assumption leading to a contradiction.
 
 • There can exist another line, call it a, that can be perpendicular to t that  also passes through line n, say at P. So, t⊥a. Through a point not on a given line, this is only one perpendicular that can be drawn to the given line.
 
 • Since t⊥ m and t⊥ a, then a || m. If two lines are perpendicular to the same line, the two lines are parallel.
 
 •  We were given that m | | n, and we now have a | | m. The problem is that line a and line n both pass through point P and are parallel to m.  This contradicts the Parallel Postulate that says through a point not on line m, only one line can be drawn parallel to line m.
                           • The assumption leads to a contradiction.• t ⊥ n
 
 | 
 
 Indirect Proof
 
 
 |  
  
 
 
                     
                       | 
                         
                           |  | If two lines are perpendicular, they form four right angles. |  |  
                     
                       |  |  It makes no difference "where" you label the "box", since all of the angles are right angles.
                        We will start with ∠1. Proof:Perpendicular lines form right angles so ∠1 is a right ∠ with a measure of 90º. Since vertical angles are congruent, ∠2 will be 90º and be a right angle.
 ∠1 and ∠3 form a linear pair and supplements.  m∠3+m∠1=180. By subtraction, m∠3=90º making it a right angle.  Vertical angles makes ∠4 same measure as ∠3 which is 90º, a right angle.
 |  
  
 
 
                     
                       | 
                         
                           |  | If two lines intersect to form a linear pair of congruent angles, then the lines are perpendicular. |  |  
                     
                       | Proof:When two adjacent angles form a linear pair, their non-shared sides form a straight line (m). This tells us that the measures of the two angles will add to 180º. m∠1+m∠2=180. If these two angles also happen to be congruent (of equal measure), we  have two angles of the same size adding to 180º. 2m∠1=180. So m∠1=90.
 Each angle will be right angles making  m ⊥ n.
 |  
 |   
 
 
                     
                       | 
                         
                           |  | If two sides of two adjacent acute angles are perpendicular, then the angels are complementary. |  |  
                     
                       |  | Proof:In the diagram at the left, ∠1 and ∠2 are acute adjacent angles whose non-shared sides are perpendicular, m ⊥ n.
 
 Since perpendiculars form right angles (90º), we know the m∠1 + m∠2 = 90º, making the angles  complementary, by definition.
 |    
                   
 
  
          | NOTE:  The re-posting of materials (in part or whole) from this site to the Internet 
            is  copyright violationand is not considered "fair use" for educators. Please read the "Terms of Use".
 |  |  |